Straight Talk - Part VII

19 July 2008

Recently, John McCain has been going around and saying things like this:


"As for offshore drilling, it’s safe enough these days that not even Hurricanes Katrina and Rita could cause significant spillage from the battered rigs off the coasts of New Orleans and Houston."

Here is the video:


But it's not just John McCain. This has been a popular myth, reverberating in the echo chamber lately:


Notice especially how McCain's campaign adviser Nancy Pfotenhauer (who, incidentally, was the top lobbyist for Koch Industries) says that "We withstood Hurricanes Rita and Katrina and didn’t spill a drop."

This is quite simply a bald-faced lie, designed to promote McCain's off-shore drilling plan (which will do nothing whatsoever to gas prices, and will only marginally divert oil profits from Canadian to American companies - and not even that will happen for another decade). Either that, or McCain heard it from one of his oil-lobbyist campaign advisers and simply repeated it as truth (which is equally troubling, since McCain isn't very smart and these are the people who are responsible for designing his policy proposals for him).

In reality, as some of us remember, there were plenty of oil spills in the Gulf of Mexico during Katrina and Rita. Here is a satellite picture of one:


In fact, the Minerals Management Service wrote an entire report on the damage that was done (read it here). Among the findings:


Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Caused 124 Offshore Spills For A Total Of
743,700 Gallons. 554,400 gallons were crude oil and condensate from platforms, rigs and pipelines, and 189,000 gallons were refined products from platforms and rigs. [MMS, 1/22/07]

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Caused Six Offshore Spills Of 42,000 Gallons Or Greater. The largest of these was 152,250 gallons, well over the 100,000 gallon threshold considered a “major spill.” [MMS, 5/1/06]


When will the news networks pick up on this and label McCain a liar? The media was all over Al Gore back in 2000 (for some statements they willfully misinterpreted as lies), yet McCain gets treated like some sort of "straight-talk" maverick.

UPDATE: Is anybody surprised by this:
"Oil and gas industry executives and employees donated $1.1 million to McCain
last month -- three-quarters of which came after his June 16 speech calling for
an end to the ban -- compared with $116,000 in March, $283,000 in April and
$208,000 in May."


Part I: "I'm the only one the special interests don't give money to." False.
Part II: "Every time in history we have raised taxes it has cut revenues." False.
Part III: "Romney provided taxpayer-funded abortions." Highly misleading.
Part IV: "Iran[] taking Al Qaeda into Iran, training them and sending them back." Unsupported.
Part V: "We have drawn down to pre-surge levels" False.
Part VI: "Saddam Hussein is on a crash course to construct a nuclear weapon." False.

Brian Lehrer and Glenn Greenwald on FISA Vote

09 July 2008

Journalism: FOX News Style

06 July 2008

The New York Times recently ran a column about the drop in ratings at FOX News. In response, FOX ran a story that doctored photos of the NYT journalists to make them look more ghoulish, even going so far as to yellow their teeth:



This is the same FOX that (falsely) claimed that Obama was trained at a radical Muslim madrassa, that keeps on claiming that global warming is a hoax, that continuously promotes sex stories with little news value, that obsessed over Anna Nicole Smith, that entertains entire discussions about how shrill Hillary Clinton's voice is, that compares Obama to Hitler, that claims John Edwards supporters are racists, etc. How far do they have to go before people realize how completely ridiculous they are?

UPDATE: Video here:


UPDATE II:Here is a video of Rupert Murdoch laughably defending FOX News as a balanced and respectable news source, and lying about CNN (he says that the "extremely liberal" CNN never had a conservative voice on the channel, ignoring the programs hosted by Glenn Beck, Tucker Carlson, Joe Scarborough, Pat Buchanan, and Robert Novak).

FOX News Has the Story - Part XVII

29 June 2008



Part I: Sex Robots
Part II: Sex Teachers
Part III: Lingerie Bowl
Part IV: Panty Bandits
Part V: Hooters Haircuts
Part VI: Sexy Stripper Scam
Part VII: Stripper Fitness
Part VIII: Exotic Erotic Ball
Bonus: FOX Attacks
Part IX: Drunk Upskirt Pictures
Bonus: FOX Porn
Part X: Bunny Bar
Part XI: Teens Seen Grinding
Part XII: Porno-Tax!
Part XIII: Sexy Teacher
Part XIV: Sugar Mamas and Boy Toys
Part XV: Sexy Part-Time Job
Part XVI: Hot Cops

Paul Roberts on Biofuels

28 June 2008









Journalism: FOX News Style

Supreme Court Rules Death Penalty Is 'Totally Badass'

27 June 2008


Supreme Court Rules Death Penalty Is 'Totally Badass'

Study: Most Children Strongly Opposed To Children’s Healthcare

22 June 2008


Study: Most Children Strongly Opposed To Children�s Healthcare

Amory Lovins: Winning the Oil Endgame

FOX News Has the Story - Part XVI














Part I: Sex Robots
Part II: Sex Teachers
Part III: Lingerie Bowl
Part IV: Panty Bandits
Part V: Hooters Haircuts
Part VI: Sexy Stripper Scam
Part VII: Stripper Fitness
Part VIII: Exotic Erotic Ball
Bonus: FOX Attacks
Part IX: Drunk Upskirt Pictures
Bonus: FOX Porn
Part X: Bunny Bar
Part XI: Teens Seen Grinding
Part XII: Porno-Tax!
Part XIII: Sexy Teacher
Part XIV: Sugar Mamas and Boy Toys
Part XV: Sexy Part-Time Job

Barack Obama on FISA

21 June 2008


This is pretty disappointing.

Just this past October, Obama spokesperson Bill Burton had this to say about Obama and FISA:

"To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies."
Even more recently, in January 2008, Obama himself had this to say:
"I strongly oppose retroactive immunity in the FISA bill."
However, Obama came out in support of a "compromise" on FISA that includes retroactive immunity. Within his statement, he said this:
"[The bill] does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses."
Despite this language, it appears that Obama will support the bill even if he cannot remove the provisions relating to retroactive immunity. I'm doubtful that he will make a big issue over this, and I'm doubtful that he will remove anything. But even besides the retroactive immunity provision, there are some troubling aspects in this bill that would give a future President Obama some pretty broad powers to spy domestically without a warrant, and without cause.

Although this may be the politically expedient thing to do, it's not the right thing to do.

UPDATE: I've been a little too busy to write regularly here lately, but I'm also skeptical of the "windfall profits tax." Does anybody have some good reading material on the topic?

UPDATE II: On the other side of the aisle, John McCain has made very clear his total support for retroactive immunity, and has actually already voted in favor of it.

Political Ads: Norm Coleman

Graph: ANWR Drilling

20 June 2008

Graph: Vehicle Miles Traveled


(via Department of Transportation)

Charlie Rose: Amory Lovins

18 June 2008